DIGITAL TO ANALOG CONVERSION, getting the bits to my speakers
Banner

Posts Tagged ‘Beethoven’

Day 18. George Crumb. Beethoven.

Friday, February 5th, 2010

There are two performances that I have seen that have unexpectedly changed my life. And tonight’s selections actually capture both of them.

I have many recordings of the Beethoven String Quartets. They may be my favorite body of work … ever. Beethoven is often thought of first and foremost as a symphonist (and for good reason, don’t get me wrong). The quartets are a different beast though. Intimate, close and extremely personal. He took this instrumentation (already standardized by the earlier Viennese classical tradition with Haydn and Mozart) and greatly added weight to its repertoire. I have MANY recordings of the quartets (5 or 6 I think?) so I will talk about them a great deal over the course of this project, but since this is the first set I am transferring, I’ll start with a story about the first time I heard one of them.

My junior year of high school, a quartet visited Roseville High School and performed the Op. 59 #1 and Op. 59 #3 quartets in the school library. I was not in the least bit interested in hearing them. In fact I wasn’t that into classical music at all. My main contact with classical music had come from the concert band repertoire that we played in band during the non-marching band season. Holst and Vaughn Williams were OK, and I did really like a band arrangement we performed of Bach’s ‘Little Fugue’ in g minor. Anyways – I wasn’t interested in hearing any string quartets, much less an hour of them. But – we had to go.

I had no idea people could play like this. The opening cello melody in Op. 59 #1, the independent melodic lines that seem to fight around each other only to come together into large chords… and … and I didn’t know! What was I hearing? I ran to work that day and found a cassette of Op. 59 #1 (the little Roseville Tower didn’t have #3) and on that tape was also a recording of the Grosse Fuge which I was excited about since I liked the Bach fugue we played in band so much. Wow – was I in for a shock. This wasn’t anything like the Bach fugue, and I couldn’t believe how intense the music was. I didn’t realize it at the time, but hearing that group play was what got me interested in listening to (then trying to understand and finally wanting to perform and compose) classical music. The Op. 59 quartets are still some of my favorite. The recording from tonight is from the 70s (if I remember correctly) with the Quator Vegh. Some very nice performances (relaxed for the most part), but the recording is a bit boomy in the cello, and thin in the violins. Like I said though – much more about Beethoven quartets in the future (especially about the differences in performance).

The second performance that would greatly change my life occurred in Copenhagen (during my first trip to Europe). Bassoonist Külli Sass (now Lambertsen) had contacted me about performing my ‘Music for Bassoon and Computer’, and I was able to pull together funds to make it out for the concert during the conservatory’s new music festival. Külli was an amazing performer, and we had a great couple days rehearsing. The night of the concert though featured a performance of George Crumb’s ‘Vox Balanae’. I had heard this piece once before and enjoyed it, but seeing it performed (masks, blue lights and amplified) was thrilling. Even more thrilling was watching the performers. They paid SUCH close attention to each other and played together in a way that I hadn’t ever seen students other students do. After the concert I wrote to Külli and asked if she would be interested in having a new piece, and also wondered if the performers from the Crumb piece and another player who had performed a solo bass piece may also be interested. They all said yes and we figured out a way to put the piece together. The piece became my doctoral dissertation ‘Organon Sostenuto’ for flute (Tanja Backe), cello (Pia Enblom), bassoon (Külli), double bass (Kristján Orri Sigurleifsson) and computer (myself). We performed the piece in Copenhagen a year after my first trip out, then they all came to Seattle a few months later for my doctoral recital. One of the main ideas behind the piece was a lack of information in the score about how melodic parts were supposed to line up – the performers needed to pull this aspect of the piece together as a group (and as a result, I had to program a computer part that could be flexible with them). When I think about the composer I was before this piece and then who I am after working with this amazing group of musicians, I am stunned at how much I changed. I grew more working on this one piece then I probably did in the 5 years of graduate school leading up to it. The experience drastically changed my belief in what is important for musicians and composers to learn. They made me realize how little notes on a page can matter. The end result – the sound that the musicians create – is the only thing that matters and it doesn’t really matter how that information is passed to them as long as it is passed! And typing this tonight, I realize that this is what happened during that first performance I heard of the Beethoven quartet. It was the sound of the group working as a whole that is greater then its parts.

Day 5. Rubinstein playing Chopin, Queen and Beethoven.

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

I first heard most of Chopin’s music with the performances of Arthur Rubinstein (released by BMG). These recordings are quite possibly the standard for Chopin’s music, 90% of which is for solo piano. This box set (11 CDs total) also includes both of Chopin’s concertos but a number of works are missing. This set doesn’t pretend in any way to be a ‘complete’ Chopin (some notable solo pieces are missing – especially the etudes), but if you are going to grab a strong representation of Chopin’s work it would be hard to find a better choice then this one.

Idil Birit also did an excellent set of recordings of Chopin’s work on Naxos. She is a wonderful pianist and the recordings are very well done. But one drawback to that box is the feeling that there was a time table set to get the complete Chopin piano works compiled, and as a result there is an unevenness in the performances. None are bad… and her sense of tempo and the all important ‘Chopin rubato; is certainly there, but there are a number of pieces that feel like she isn’t as familiar with them. And while there are many advantages to grabbing all of something in a single box, with only a few exceptions do I really think it is a good idea – especially if that box is part of a ‘project’. One of the things that I think makes the Rubinstein box stand out so well is that it is compiled from recordings that span over two decades. So what you get are recordings that capture not only a huge amount of Chopin’s music, but a significant chunk of Rubinstein’s career. You don’t get a sense with these performances that anything is filler, or being performed to satisfy a completist goal. They all sound quite personal. And though it could be argued that there are probably better recordings of the Nocturnes (for example – I once had a great argument about the Rubinstein vs. the Ashkenazy recordings) I think it would be hard to say that there are any other recordings that feel like you have a performer and composer so close to each other. And you as the listener is brought in close as well. I could probably go into the Romantic notions about why so much of Chopin’s music is written for solo piano, but I would rather just say that this music really is made for a small audience. On a concert stage they seem out of place. But in the studio space where these were mostly recorded, a sense of intimacy is captured that many recital or modern recordings seem to miss. I wouldn’t say they feel like Rubinstein is here in the room with me, but I feel like these are recordings that capture a sense of small space. And that is how I like to hear Chopin played.

So from the small space to the stadium – ‘The Queen’s Jewels’ is a blue velvet box set containing Queen’s first 8 albums (basically all the albums from the 70s). This of course includes Wayne and Garth’s favorite and the theme song to the Met’s 1986 World Series victory. Of the later – whenever I hear ‘We Will Rock You’ start, I generally can’t wait to get through the first 1:15 or so of the song. I can understand how the drums, hand claps and group of voices yelling ‘We Will, We Will Rock YOU!’ can get a stadium full of people pumped up, but it is the slow swell of Brain May’s guitar that makes this song for me. What an amazing guitarist, with an amazing guitar sound. And it is when he finally cuts off the singing with that amazing solo that the song FINALLY does start to rock.

Queen has been one of those bands that has never been at the forefront of my musical tastes. I think they are great, and there is even a nod to ‘Killer Queen’ in one of my pieces. But I rarely think ‘I’m in the mood for listening to Queen’. But then they come on and I have a great time, only to repeat the cycle. But I have seen the fanaticism they can inspire. When I was 16 and first working at Tower Records, one of my fellow employees (Thad) was one of the first people I had to ever really spend time with and I didn’t get along with. The guy was an ass… abrasive, rude and … well, mostly filled with hate. I heard Ministry for the first time because Thad was playing it and I think this was generally on the timid side for him. Anyways, the day Freddie Mercury dies I come into work, and Queen is playing VERY loudly in the store. And there is Thad behind the counter, tears streaming down from behind his black sunglasses onto his black leather vest. On the dry-erase board behind the counter is a red and black dry-erase homage to Freddie. And the second I walk in, he just storms into the back room, leaving me to run the record store solo for the next few hours. This guy has never shown an emotion in the three months I had worked there except contempt, and now here he was bawling his eyes out and needing cover. ‘Who Wants To Live Forever’ had been on repeat.

This was my first time ever having the record store to myself.

While Thad had opened ‘A Kind of Magic’ just for that song, I remember continuing the tribute by digging out three British import discs we had (that mostly became the Classic Queen CD here in the US). While ‘Who Wants To Live Forever’ is a beautiful song, I had a feeling that Freddie would probably rather have everyone in the store listening to ‘Bicycle Race’. Whether Freddie did or not, it was certainly what I preferred hearing that day.

The next day, Thad thanked me for covering. It was one of the only times he would ever actually say something directly to me.afterwards he went on being his regular ass self. But quite often when I hear Queen, I think about that scene.

The last set of discs I ripped tonight are David Zinman’s Beethoven Symphonies. For those who keep track of these types of things, these were the first modern instrument recordings of the New Barenreiter Edition. John Eliot Gardiner had recorded these editions on period instruments about five years earlier, and in general both of those sets are lots of fun to listen to. Though when it comes to Beethoven’s symphonies, I still go back to the 1963 Karajan recordings more then any others.

Day 4. Beethoven, Lee Morgan, Billy Bragg & Wilco and Monteverdi

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

Tonight’s selections were:

Billy Bragg & Wilco: Mermaid Ave. 2

Lee Morgan: Leeway (the RVG edition)

Monteverdi: L’Orfeo (John Eliot Gardiner conducting on Archiv)

Beethoven: complete piano trios from the DG Complete Beethoven Edition

I can’t possibly talk about all of these at the moment, and I have only listened so far to some of the Beethoven and the Lee Morgan. So I’ll stick to those.

‘Leeway’, and the series from Blue Note that it is released under the ‘Rudy Van Gelder edition’ sounds like what Blue Note jazz in the late 50s and 60s sounded like, mostly because so much was recorded in Rudy Van Gelder’s living room (and later his custom studio). The number of GREAT jazz albums recorded by RVG is astounding, and when Blue Note started re-releasing these recordings in the 2000s (remastered by RVG himself) I grabbed as many as I could every time Blue Note discs were on sale. They sound great. And even better is the exposure you get to some great artists that may seem peripheral to the jazz greats. But you really do get a sense of how all of these guys worked and played together on each other’s albums. Hearing a ‘Lee Morgan’ album isn’t just a Lee Morgan album. Art Blakey, Paul Chambers, Jackie McLean and Bobby Timmons are in on the session as well. All of these guys had albums under their own names, most notably Art Blakey. And I love Lee Morgan – but how were the decisions made about who would get the album credit? Why isn’t this an Art Blakey album? When it comes down to it, this one really does feature Lee Morgan… hands down. But then you listen to “Lazy Bird” on John Coltrane’s album “Blue Train”, and how is THAT not something that belongs on a Lee Morgan album???

Nice stretched out performances (the shortest track is still over 8 minutes) that are just cool. And what the RVG recordings show you is how important a recording engineer can be. The sound on RVG recordings really have a signature. There is a story I remember hearing about the first time Herbie Hancock recorded at the studio. Apparently he came in and started to move the piano a bit away from a wall, then started to move a microphone boom stand, and Rudy freaks out. The piano and microphones HAD to be in those spots for it to sound right. The way the sound bounced off the wall and the distance of the mic from the piano had been tuned over years of trial and error…

The recording engineer (and producers) are often the most overlooked musicians. Without them, sound wouldn’t be captured and made available for us to listen to. And they need to learn how to play their instruments in the same way a saxophonist does. It takes years of practice to get your sound, and after a little practice on a listeners part you can recognize RVG recordings (on many labels) just like you would recognize Lee Morgan’s trumpet sound.

The Beethoven discs are the piano trio recordings by Wilhelm Kempff, Pierre Fournier and Henryk Szeryng made in the late 60s. Kempff and Fournier are two of my favorite classical musicians of all time. I also have live recordings that the two of them did of the Beethoven Cello Sonatas. What is so fun about both the piano trio recordings and the sonatas is the sense of enjoyment these performers bring to pieces that they had probably known for 3 to 4 decades at this point in their lives. This is music that is in their muscles. A part of their physicality. But with the wisdom comes age. The performances are not ‘perfect’… there are missed notes here and there, and sometimes you can feel the group pull back a little to regroup. But everything is so musical. There actually isn’t a single note in these recordings. There is such a continuity that it is hard to believe that what we hear these three men playing is somehow represented by something as finite as dots and lines on a page. Beethoven is so lucky to have had people in this world that know and play his music with such connection. Well – Beethoven is lucky, but we are just as lucky! I could go on further, but I need to save something for the many returns to these artists I will be making in the future.